Cases 1 - 10 of 26
THORPE v. TOWNSHIP OF SALISBURY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2021cv02102
Defendant:
MEGAN C HOUCK, JAMES R SUHOCKI, DONALD B. BRITTON and others
Plaintiff:
JOE THORPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGIA v. NATIONAL SEATING AND MOBILITY, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00708
Defendant:
TIM FLANAGAN, BRIAN WARD, PERMOBIL AB and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD B. GEORGIA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. BALLAH AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv06057
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
BALLAH AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES, L.L.C., DONALD B. BALLAH, LISA JEAN BALLAH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SEVERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55796
Plaintiff:
DONALD B SEVERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HUDSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv52259
Plaintiff:
DONALD B HUDSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HUDSON v. ANCHORAGE TANKSHIP CORP.
as 2:2011cv52260
Plaintiff:
DONALD B HUDSON
Defendant:
ANCHORAGE TANKSHIP CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TUCK v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv49643
Plaintiff:
DONALD B. TUCK
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
O'LEARY et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40398
Plaintiff:
DONALD B O'LEARY , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EMERSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65965
Plaintiff:
DONALD B. EMERSON and VIOLET EMERSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
