Cases 1 - 10 of 117
SMITH
as 2:2021cv05001
In Re:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CARLOS SAUL, MIKE GREENBURG, ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. CITIZEN'S BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv02423
Plaintiff:
FRED E. SMITH and MATTIE L. SMITH
Defendant:
CITIZEN'S BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY JAVARDIAN LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
CARTER v. CDI CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv03839
Plaintiff:
PETER CARTER
Defendant:
CDI CORP. , JOSEPH L. CARLINI , MICHAEL J. EMMI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
JURMU v. CDI CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv03787
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. JURMU
Defendant:
CDI CORP. , WALTER R. GARRISON , LAWRENCE C. KARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
SCARANTINO v. CDI CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv03700
Plaintiff:
LOUIS SCARANTINO , ROBERT J. JURMU and PETER CARTER
Defendant:
CDI CORP. , JOSEPH L. CARLINI , MICHAEL J. EMMI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
THOMPSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv04928
Plaintiff:
CALVIN H. THOMPSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RUSHTON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI FRACKVILLE/MAHANOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07265
Plaintiff:
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. , AF TAXI, INC. , AG TAXI, INC. and others
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TRAVIS KALANICK, JON FELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
