Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TAYLOR et al v. TUMOLO et al
as 2:2019cv04533
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAGSDALE, VERONICA TAYLOR, JULIUS BUTLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN CAHILL, JOE GILLESPIE, CARL WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RHAMES v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04011
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RHAMES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , JOSE MEDINA , JAMES BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE et al v. BRAVE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURKE and KATHLEEN BURKE
Defendant:
BRAVE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ESKRIDGE v. BAKER et al
as 2:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
LAKENYA ESKRIDGE
Defendant:
JOHNNIE BAKER , DEBORAH BROWN , ARLENE HELEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE et al v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67717
Plaintiff:
DONNA BURKE , JAMES BURKE , DEBRA ANN BURKE-CAPONE and others
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79060
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURKS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS, INC. , ASARCO INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURKE and CAPPONI ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2006cv03396
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT FERWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68639
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURKE, JR
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., AC & S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
