Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MUHAMMAD v. FIGUREROA et al
as 2:2021cv03372
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CYNTHIA FIGUREROA, LATOYA CARR-HERMITT, CHARLENE SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAU et al v. NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv03245
Plaintiff:
DUNG H. LAU and PROVIDENCE RECOVERY HOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA and ZONING HEARING BOARD OF NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LAU v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv02208
Plaintiff:
WIEN YAN JAMIE LAU
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. LAU et al
as 2:2016cv05665
Plaintiff:
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN E. LAU , FRANK DELUCA , EDWARD KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
3 G WIRELESS, INC et al v. METRO PCS PENNSYLVANIA, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06319
Plaintiff:
3 G WIRELESS, INC , JOSEPH CHO , ELITE MOBILE, INC and others
Defendant:
METRO PCS PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, JOHN SHELTON, LOUIS PELTZER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
REED-LAU v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01038
Plaintiff:
SHELLY LYNN REED-LAU
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC. , MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE DIVISION OF MCNEIL-PPC, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAU v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56816
Plaintiff:
HARRY LAU
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAU v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv57129
Plaintiff:
KAM Y. LAU
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAU v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59185
Plaintiff:
WALLY WING YIT LAU
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
