Cases 1 - 10 of 2,976
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
LEE v. MCDONOUGH
as 2:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
KATINA LEE
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
SHABAZZ v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv01906
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
PIERRE THOMAS, KEVIN COACH K. LEE, KELAN WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SHABAZZ v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
PIERRE THOMAS, KEVIN COACH K LEE, KELAN WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Hamilton v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 2:2024cv01446
Petitioner:
Barry Lee Hamilton
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. SOVEREIGN SWEETS et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN SWEETS, VINCENT WATSON, ANDRE DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
SCHAPPELL v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE LEE SCHAPPELL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ALEXANDER v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
LEE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and JACOB SECORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
