Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
NIEVES GUZMAN v. LINEAGE LOGISTICS et al
as 5:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
ANGEL NIEVES GUZMAN
Defendant:
LINEAGE LOGISTICS, OCS LOGISTICS and JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious individuals)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
NIEVES v. ENGINEERED ARRESTING SYSTEMS CORP.
as 2:2023cv01804
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY NIEVES
Defendant:
ENGINEERED ARRESTING SYSTEMS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DE JESUS NIEVES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
JORGE JAVIER DE JESUS NIEVES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
NIEVES v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv03621
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL NIEVES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NIEVES GUZMAN v. LINEAGE LOGISTICS
as 2:2022cv03549
Plaintiff:
Angel Nieves Guzman
Defendant:
Lineage Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
NIEVES v. BOROUGH OF WEST CHESTER et al
as 2:2021cv04778
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NIEVES
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WEST CHESTER, WCPD OFFICER JERRY FERRIOLA, WCPD OFFICER GREG CUGINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIEVES v. SAV-A-LOT et al
as 2:2020cv01348
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, LLC and SAV-A-LOT
Plaintiff:
BETTY NIEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
