Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY LENDING GROUP, L.P. v. UNITED BANK, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv01482
Defendant: KOURT SECURITY PARTNERS, LLC and UNITED BANK, INC.
Plaintiff: GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY GROUP, L.P. and GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY LENDING GROUP, L.P.
Counter Defendant: GS SECURITY ALARM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. MOOREFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv02891
Defendant: SATELLITE'S, TCB.GOV, NRC.GOV and others
Plaintiff: NEAL D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROOKFIELD EQUINOX LLC v. UNITED BANK CARD, INC.
as 5:2016cv03622
Plaintiff: BROOKFIELD EQUINOX LLC
Defendant: UNITED BANK CARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07098
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WRIGHT v. UNITED BANKING SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07490
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WRIGHT
Defendant: UNITED BANKING SYSTEMS, INC., REZRO INC. and CHRISTOPHER MIRZAI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ARCHWAY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC et al v. HARRIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv05867
Plaintiff: ARCHWAY INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC , UNION ONE INSURANCE GROUP, LLC , NEVADA INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC and others
Defendant: JAMES HARRIS , HARRIS CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. , GREGORY HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
KENDALL STATE BANK et al v. UNION ONE INSURANCE GROUP, LLC
as 2:2009cv00494
Plaintiff: KENDALL STATE BANK, GARDEN CITY STATE BANK, PEABODY STATE BANK and others
Defendant: UNION ONE INSURANCE GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
PHELPS v. UNITED BANK OF PHILA.
as 2:2007cv02013
Plaintiff: CARL M. PHELPS, JR.
Defendant: UNITED BANK OF PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?