Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Montolis v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S) XI-XX, JOHN DOE(S) I-X, RASIER, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Montolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SANTIAGO v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2024cv02683
Defendant:
COURTNEY SIMMONS, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and PORTIER, LLC
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ZAHAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
EASRAT ZAHAN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MELENDEZ v. DAI et al
as 2:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
JAJAIRA MELENDEZ
Defendant:
DALIANG DAI, RASIER-PA, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Garcia v. Titan et al
as 2:2024cv01036
Administrator:
Maritza L Garcia
Defendant:
Gara Titan, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
as 2:2023cv05038
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
SERRANO v. UPPERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv04482
Plaintiff:
NOEL SERRANO
Defendant:
NAYLAN UPPERMAN, RAISER-PA, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. BODDIE
as 2:2023cv03780
Plaintiff:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
KEVIN BODDIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC, RASIER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
