Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Nealman v. Laughlin et al
as 1:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
Tawna Z. Nealman
Defendant:
Ryan P. Laughlin, Robert Maben, Christian Z. Snook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Austin et al
as 1:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Ray Lewis Baker
Defendant:
Sarah Austin, Roxxanne Gardner and Austin Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Austin et al
as 1:2014cv01634
Plaintiff:
Ray Lewis Baker
Defendant:
Sarah Austin, Roxxanne Gardner and Austin Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankin v. Majikes et al
as 3:2014cv00699
Plaintiff:
James Rankin
Defendant:
John Majikes , Scott Hine , Joseph Zigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.W. et al v. Holtzapple et al
as 4:2013cv03051
Plaintiff:
K.W. , F.E. , B.J. and others
Defendant:
Julie A. Holtzapple , James R. Middleton , Michael C. Griffiths and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels et al v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv02922
Plaintiff:
Kamar Samuels and Mozella McClendon-Samuels
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department , Tobyhanna Township , Mount Pocono Borough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre v. Beebe Hospital / Medical Center et al
as 1:2013cv02881
Plaintiff:
Raymond Pierre
Defendant:
Beebe Hospital / Medical Center, Beebe Medial Center Pavillion, William Swain Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boldrini v. Wetzel, et al.
as 3:2013cv02485
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Lewis W. Wetzel, Noah E. Katz, Eugene P. Feeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. Monroe County et al
as 3:2012cv02320
Plaintiff:
Kamar Samuels
Defendant:
Monroe County , Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department , Harry Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dearing v. Dowling et al
as 1:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Karmin Dearing
Defendant:
Andrew H. Dowling, Jenna Lewis and James McGrady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
