Cases 21 - 30 of 696
Andrews v. F.C.I. Schuylkill et al
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Andrews, III
Defendant:
F.C.I. Schuylkill and Warden Beth Rickard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harkins v. Wapinsky et al
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gage A. Harkins
Defendant:
David Wapinsky and C.O. Matthew Donnelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wapinsky et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams
Defendant:
Warden Wapinsky and C.O. Donalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Hakeim Perkins
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy et al v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
David Murphy, Benjamin Mathis and Ashley Capiga
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, C.O. Donnaly, C.O. Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bettis v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
Eric Bettis
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Line and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fogel v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02124
Plaintiff:
Brian Fogel
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Frank Paul
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herb v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02127
Plaintiff:
Brandon Herb
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
