Cases 11 - 20 of 290
Rahman v. Jones, Jr. Esq
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Farida B. Rahman
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, Jr. Esq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Johnson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections doing business as SCI-Dallas, Kevin Ranson, Jason Bohinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padgett v. Petti et al
as 4:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
Lynn A. Padgett
Defendant:
James Petti, Robert B. McGuiness, Daniel J. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pierre et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
Macarton N. Pierre, Jane Doe and Yolanda R. Browning
Defendant:
Ian D. Martin, John B. Pike and Brian M. Szumski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Newton v. Akers
as 3:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Sye Newton
Defendant:
Cordt Cullen Akers d/b/a The Akers Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
