Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Gearhart v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Amy Gearhart
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Kevin Ransom, Osmel Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
JohnJuan White
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer et al v. Havens et al
as 4:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Krista Meyer, K.J., K.A. and others
Defendant:
Officer Tyson Havens, 1-5 John/Jane Doe and John/Jane Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zito v. Gettle et al
as 1:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Charles Zito
Defendant:
Jennifer Gettle, Sean McCormack, Stefanie Flick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McQuaid v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv02019
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. McQuaid
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Laurel Harry, John/Jane Does 1 - 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe #1 et al v. Delaware Valley School District et al
as 3:2021cv01778
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant:
Delaware Valley School District, Jack Fisher, Jessica Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bartol et al v. Arbogast et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Katherine Bartol
Defendant:
Dauphin County, John/Jane Does 1 - 10 and Pamela Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
