Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Capozzi v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review et al
as 3:2017cv02152
Plaintiff:
Frank James Capozzi, Sr.
Defendant:
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review and Bonnie Haas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hohman et al v. Mayor and City Counsel of Baltimore et al
as 1:2017cv01461
Plaintiff:
David Hohman, Sr. and Ashley Hohman
Defendant:
Mayor and City Counsel of Baltimore , Baltimore City Police Department , Anthony W. Batts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aviles v. Eisenhart et al
as 1:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
Julio Aviles, Sr.
Defendant:
Nichole Eisenhart, Eric Shuefobottom, Brett Hopking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allam v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 1:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Allam, Sr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA, Pike County and Susan E. Schwab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Briggs v. Potter County et al
as 4:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ralph Briggs, Sr.
Defendant:
Potter County, Glenn Drake, II, Susan Kefover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sprague et al v. Cortes
as 1:2016cv02169
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Sprague , Ronald D. Castille , Stephen Zappala, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Pedro A. Cortes
Amicu:
Jeffrey A. Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitchen v. PA Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2016cv02129
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Kitchen, Sr.
Defendant:
PA Board of Probation and Parole, Jeffrey Ruzicki and Douglas Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Carter v. Chance
as 1:2016cv00504
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
Todd R. Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
