Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Turner v. County of Lycoming et al
as 4:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Turner
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Lycoming County Prison, Brad A. Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 1:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Keyona Johnson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, Trooper Costello and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osagie v. Borough of State College et al
as 4:2020cv02024
Defendant:
John Does #1-10 and Borough of State College
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Osagie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Pennsy Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00746
Defendant:
Brett Thorius, Pennsy Supply, Inc., John Siminiskus and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kane et al v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2019cv01544
Defendant:
Dauphin County Board of Prison Inspectors, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., John Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Kane, Estate of Sarah Elizabeth Quinn and Michael E. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Penn v. Detweiler et al
as 1:2018cv00912
Plaintiff:
Melissa Dyann Penn
Defendant:
Galen Detweiler , Bradley Engle , City of York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
