Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00819
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Driscoll v. Litwhiler et al
as 3:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
Donna Driscoll
Defendant:
Douglas Litwhiler and Township of Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hadesty v. Rush Township Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv02319
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Hadesty
Defendant:
Rush Township Police Department, Duane Frederick, Adam Sinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Postie v. Frederick et al
as 3:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Postie
Defendant:
Sergeant Duane Frederick, Adam Sinton, Jr., Rush Township and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Hess et al
as 3:2013cv02292
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hughes
Defendant:
Bradley J. Hess , Rush Township Police Department and Duane Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. Corbett et al
as 4:2013cv01226
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
Tom Corbett, Kathleen Kane, Linda Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Ross et al
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas Manning
Defendant:
Pamela D Ross, Summit Dermatology Chambersburg Hospital, Orion Hippensteel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamey v. Northumberland County et al
as 4:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
John Lamey
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Northumberland County Board of Commissioners, Township of Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Broadwater v. Fow et al
as 1:2012cv01937
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Broadwater
Defendant:
Christian D. Fow, Nathan R. Swink, Ralph A. Hockenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
