Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Montevechi v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv00652
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Montevechi
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Mathew Osterberg , Jeff Angradi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Wetzel
as 1:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hampton
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Mariosa Lamas, Jeffery Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Norwood et al
as 1:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Marc Erick Barrett
Defendant:
J. Norwood, Robert Womeldorf, Bergon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Anesburg et al
as 1:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anesburg, Mary McCollum, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxton v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, Eric Holder, Charles Samuel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Falice v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv00573
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Falice
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Graham Mullen, Robert Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Graham v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00545
Plaintiff:
Donald Graham
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graham v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fattah v. Moore-Smeal et al
as 3:2012cv00613
Plaintiff:
Abdel Fattah
Defendant:
Moore-Smeal, Marirosa Lamas, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Samuel et al
as 3:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Smith
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr., FCI Allenwood, FCI Elkton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
