Cases 1 - 10 of 356
Johnson v. Boose et al
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Raheem Johnson
Defendant:
Boose, CAPTAIN Baptiste, GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR Heist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: Johnson
as 1:2023cv02001
Plaintiff:
Jahquill Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Spyker et al
as 1:2023cv01839
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Young
Defendant:
Ms. Spyker, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Loy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv01841
Petitioner:
Nedrick Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
LSCI-Allenwood Warden R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. SCI-Coal Township et al
as 1:2023cv01551
Petitioner:
Rodney Johnson
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Coal Township, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Fieni et al
as 4:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Daryl Johnson
Defendant:
J. Fieni, Paula Price, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Barrazza
as 3:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Raymond Craig Johnson
Respondent:
Barrazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
Altawuan Moore
Defendant:
C.O. Mark Johnson and C.O. Caroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsh, Jr. v. Stratton et al
as 3:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marsh, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Stratton, J. Rivello, Johnny Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
