Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Lynch v. Thomson et al
as 1:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Lynch
Defendant:
Warden Thomson, R. Sierp, J. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mattocks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv01951
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Mattocks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Thompson, Lieutenant Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor, Jr. v. Yampolsky et al
as 3:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Frank Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Yampolsky, Superintendent Sommers, Yhetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Doll et al
as 3:2021cv02078
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Weaver
Defendant:
Clair Doll, Adam Ogle, Lawrence Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv01647
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riley
Defendant:
George Miller, James J. Cirellli, Joseph Grillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Barry Karwowski, Harold Kertes, John Battenberg and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. York County et al
as 3:2021cv00247
Defendant:
John Doe IXX, John Doe(s) XV-XVII, John Doe I and others
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Rivera v. Harper et al
as 1:2020cv02257
Defendant:
W. Dreibelbis, John Doe (2), John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Perez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremiah v. Kovach et al
as 1:2020cv01915
Defendant:
Warden Bruce Kovach, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Richard Shoch and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Jeremiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Steberger
as 4:2020cv00995
Respondent:
Cheryl Steberger and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Melvin Charles Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
