Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Burton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2022cv01625
Plaintiff:
Larry Burton
Defendant:
John Wetzel, B. Mason, C. Stetler and others
Amicus Curiae:
Bora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent Jamey P. Luther, Officer Harpster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Kerestes, Beggs, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabrera v. Clark et al
as 1:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jose Emmanuel Ortiz Cabrera
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jane Doe, Jane Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Harry et al
as 3:2015cv02469
Plaintiff:
Jason Parker
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, John E. Wetzel, James Meintel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAVIS-BEY v. KLOPOTOWSKI et al
as 4:2013cv01972
Defendant:
Klopotowski, Kerestes, Beggs and others
Plaintiff:
Naree Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2010cv01174
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Daniel Malick, Bruce Hauslyak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merring v. Correctional Care Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wayne Merring
Defendant:
Correctional Care Inc, Adam Zaloga, Barbra Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
