Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Levy v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2013cv00629
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Naula et al v. Rite Aid of New York Inc et al
as 1:2012cv02602
Plaintiff:
Angel Naula and Jose Fermin
Defendant:
Rite AId of New York, Inc. , Does 1 through 100 and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Witty v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02512
Plaintiff:
Yvon Witty and Christopher Lawrence
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Eckerd Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Laun et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2012cv01639
Plaintiff:
Lisa Laun and Deshawn Powell
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
TORRES v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv01413
Plaintiff:
Justin Torres
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Consol_plaintiff:
Priscilla Thomas and Theresa Paris
Consol_defendant:
Rite Aid of New Jersey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ibea v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2012cv01351
Plaintiff:
Eddie Ibea , Zakiya Millar , Cynthia Aponte and others
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LAUN et al v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv01301
Plaintiff:
Lisa Laun and Deshawn Powell
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
EATON et al v. RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01258
Plaintiff:
Larry Eaton , Karriem Perkins and Ricky Hawkins
Defendant:
Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
