Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Scheer et al v. Boles et al
as 3:2020cv01172
Defendant:
William D. Boles, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and Clean-Tex Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carrie Scheer and Gregory Scheer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barkley v. Bumgardner et al
as 1:2020cv00214
Defendant:
C.O. Snowberger, C.O. Nepf, C.O. Bumgardner and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Barkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dorn v. Flunory et al
as 3:2017cv01482
Plaintiff:
Jared Dorn
Defendant:
Cornelius Flunory, Guaranteed Express Incorporated, Ryder Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. FLUNORY et al
as 3:2017cv01198
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Adams and Suzanna Adams
Defendant:
CONELIUS FLUNORY , GUARANTEED EXPRESS INCORPORATED and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
CONELIUS FLUNORY and GUARANTEED EXPRESS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bleeker v. Flunory et al
as 3:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bleeker, Jr.
Defendant:
Cornelius Flunory, Guaranteed Express, Inc., Ryder System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Talley v. PA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv02074
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Flunory et al
as 3:2016cv01910
Defendant:
Cornelius Flunory, GUARANTEED EXPRESS INCORPORATED, Ryder System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
