Cases 31 - 40 of 41
United States Of America v. Boyles
as 4:2009mc00410
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Boyles
United States Of America v. Boyles
as 4:2009mc00409
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Respondent:
Kenneth L. Boyles
Boyle v. Bohinski et al
as 3:2009cv01733
Plaintiff:
Juston Bayard Boyle
Defendant:
Stanley Bohinski, Lea Liput, Donald O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyle et al v. Klopotoski et al
as 3:2009cv01665
Plaintiff:
Juston Boyle and Michael Macias
Defendant:
Michael D. Klopotoski, Lea Liputs, Eugene Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boyle v. Klopotoski et al
as 3:2009cv01158
Plaintiff:
Juston Boyle
Defendant:
Michael Klopotoski, Jerry Walsh, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lauchle et al v Keeton Group, et al
as 3:2008cv01868
Plaintiff:
Curtis R. Lauchle, Curtis R. Lauchle, Curtis R. Lauchle and others
Defendant:
The Keeton Group, LLC, Chief Oil and Gas LLC, Radler 2000 LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lauchle et al
as 4:2008cv01868
Plaintiff:
Curtis R. Lauchle, Curtis R. Lauchle, Curtis R. Lauchle and others
Defendant:
The Keeton Group, LLC, Chief Oil and Gas LLC, Radler 2000 LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lauchle et al v Keeton Group, et al
as 4:2008cv01868
Plaintiff:
Curtis R. Lauchle, Curtis R. Lauchle, Curtis R. Lauchle and others
Defendant:
The Keeton Group, LLC, Chief Oil and Gas LLC, Radler 2000 LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
