Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Boiler Tube of America et al
as 3:2018cv01466
Defendant:
Babcock Power, Inc. and Boiler Tube of America
Plaintiff:
Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01305
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
EOG Resources, Inc. v. Schneider et al
as 4:2018cv01213
Plaintiff:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
Harry E. Schneider and Alice L. Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Beers v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00862
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Beers and Trina L. Beers
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Boiler Tube of America et al
as 3:2018cv00469
Plaintiff:
Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
Boiler Tube of America and Babcock Power, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Kendall et al v. Lancaster Exploration & Development Company
as 4:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
Charles Rice Kendall , Ann P. Hochberg , Bank of America and others
Defendant:
Lancaster Exploration & Development Company
Intervenor_defendant:
Chief Oil and Gas LLC , Chief Exploration and Development, LLC , Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
