Cases 41 - 50 of 552
Kelly v. Bell et al
as 4:2022cv01940
Plaintiff:
Farrah Kelly
Defendant:
Joshua Bell, Justin Snyder and City of Williamsport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. City of Williamsport et al
as 4:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
City of Williamsport, Lycoming County and it's Officials, Officer Sarage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Glenn O. Hawbaker, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01485
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Glenn O. Hawbaker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Spriggs v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2022cv01474
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Spriggs
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg and Mayor Wanda Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Guildner et al
as 1:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Bradley R. F. Guildner and City of York, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stilp v. City of Pottsville et al
as 3:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Eugene Stilp
Defendant:
City of Pottsville and Jonathan D Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randolph v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Randolph
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Robert Fegan, Donald Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
