Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01240
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Valley Hotel et al
as 4:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Valley Hotel and Thomas E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Montemarano et al v. Penske Truck Leasing Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv02181
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Montemarano and Maria Montemarano
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Corp. , Penske Truck Leasing Co.LP. , Estate of Alfred Kinnick and others
Cross_claimant:
Gates Equipment Services LLC. , Gates Equipment Services Inc. , Solomon Garrett and others
Cross_defendant:
Gates Equipment Services LLC. , Gates Equipment Services Inc. , Solomon Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. N & B Lundy Corp.
as 4:2016mc00396
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
N & B Lundy Corp.
Perez v. Bristol Excavating, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01512
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Bristol Excavating, Inc. and Calvin Bristol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
as 4:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez et al v. Tarry Bratton, BC, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez , Secretary of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Tarry Bratton, BC, Inc. and BC, Inc., 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. IFCO Systems N.A., Inc.
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Perez and Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
IFCO Systems N.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
