Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Boyer v. Accounts Receivable Management of Florida, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01995
Plaintiff:
Robert Boyer
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Jim Lagana Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01871
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Jim Lagana Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Fabcon, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01391
Plaintiff:
James Hartman, Frank Boyer, Laborers' Local No. 1174 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Fabcon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Conmas, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00922
Plaintiff:
James Hartman, Frank Boyer, Laborers' Local No. 1174 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Conmas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ball v. SCI Muncy et al
as 1:2008cv00391
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Ball
Defendant:
SCI Muncy, Sgt. Winder, Lt. Hummel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartman et al v. Aycock, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Aycock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hartman et al v. Kospiah Excavating
as 4:2007cv01995
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
Kospiah Excavating
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund et al v. Boyer Printing and Binding Company
as 1:2007cv00801
Plaintiff:
GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund and The Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Boyer Printing and Binding Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381 E.R.I.S.A.
Hartman et al v. White Construction, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00786
Plaintiff:
James Hartman and Frank Boyer
Defendant:
White Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
