Cases 81 - 90 of 486
Endrikat v. Ransom et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
Robert Endrikat
Defendant:
Ransom, George Miller, J Cirelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbert v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01669
Plaintiff:
Charles Talbert
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Superintenent Laurel Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01633
Plaintiff:
Daryl Locke
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Rupert Samuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oxenrider v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Andy Oxenrider
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Schuylkill County and Pennsylvania Department of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez, Jr. v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv01484
Plaintiff:
Fernando Nunez, Jr.
Defendant:
John J. Wetzel, Bernadette Mason, Linda White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleem v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2021cv01413
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sohail Saleem
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, C.O. 1 Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. Simington et al
as 1:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
Luis Martinez
Defendant:
Robert Simington, Lt. Kenneth Boal, Captain Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Garman et al
as 4:2021cv01221
Plaintiff:
Rasull Gray
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Mark Garman, Nicki J. Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irby v. Pennsylvania Legislature et al
as 3:2021cv00989
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Irby
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Legislature, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
