Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 81 - 90 of 257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01919
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Prukala v. Community Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2015cv01899
Plaintiff: Michael Prukala
Defendant: Community Bank, N.A. , John Does 1-10 and Corporations X,Y, and Z
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ward v. Ethicon, inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01893
Plaintiff: Danielle Ward
Defendant: Ethicon, inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milhouse v. Heath et al
as 1:2015cv01837
Plaintiff: Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant: Susanne V. Heath, James Fosnot, R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01775
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Defillipis v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2015cv01752
Plaintiff: Shana Defillipis
Defendant: Synchrony Bank , John Does 1 - 10 and Corporations X, Y, Z
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fine Line Homes, L.P. et al v. Beiler et al
as 4:2015cv01565
Plaintiff: Fine Line Homes, L.P. and Fine Line Homes, Inc.
Defendant: Dave Beiler, Lisa A. Edinger, Sonja P. LaForm and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rinker et al v. Amori et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01293
Plaintiff: Thomas Rinker and Michelle Rinker
Defendant: Scott Amori, Amori & Associates, LLC, James Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01251
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?