Cases 1 - 10 of 922
Brown v. Ricard
as 3:2024cv00921
Petitioner:
Mark Brown
Respondent:
Warden Ricard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McCollum v. Brothers et al
as 1:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Johnnie McCollum
Respondent:
Mark Brothers and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockett v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Mark Lockett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fidler v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Mark William Fidler, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gill v. Goncalves Foernges, MD. et al
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Maria Gill
Defendant:
Luiz Goncalves Foernges, MD., Anne Theresa Lunney, MD., Matthew Scott Factor, MD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Smith, Sr. v. McGinley et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Petitioner:
Mark Edward Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gentilquore v. Brothers et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Petitioner:
Darren Richard Gentilquore
Respondent:
Mark R. Brothers and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
