Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BGN Development Corporation et al v. Moosic Borough et al
as 3:2023cv01658
Plaintiff: BGN Development Corporation and Lynn Kokinda
Defendant: Moosic Borough, Moosic Borough Council, Moosic Borough Planning Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00340
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Muhammad v. City of Lewisburg, PA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00284
Defendant: Claim Adjuster/Sterling Claims Services, Union County Sheriff Department, Chief of Police and others
Plaintiff: Tariq H Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Loftus Adjustment Company et al
as 1:2020cv00512
Defendant: Jherion Levesque, Doe 1, Frank Hurst and others
Plaintiff: Mark A. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00620
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00338
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01190
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DeWitt v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00835
Plaintiff: David DeWitt
Defendant: Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1154

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?