Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Leaphart v. Campbell, et al
as 1:2021cv01293
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Leaphart
Defendant:
William A. Campbell, J. B. Merrits, II, J. Kirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00826
Defendant:
E. Miller, Joel Barrows, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Vernon Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01930
Defendant:
C.O. M. Miller, P.S.S.-B Dubler, HEX Shawn Wiggins and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01748
Defendant:
Major Barrows, John Wetzel, Captain Acey and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv01429
Defendant:
Sgt. Vereshack, D.J. Close, C.O. Reyman and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01306
Defendant:
D.J. Close, C.O. M. Miller, Knowles and others
Not Yet Classified:
C.O. Lancass
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrows v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv01383
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Barrows
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ismail et al v. Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01839
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Ismail and Lisa Barrow
Defendant:
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. and Nuss Truck and Equipment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrow et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2015cv01331
Defendant:
Safeguard Properties, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Michelle Barrow and Daimean Subero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
