Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02062
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents, At Least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the bop operating from the special housing Unit, An Unknown Named Number of Other United States Government Agents and others
Amicu:
Nancy-Ann E. DeParle
Fifth_party_defendant:
Mona K. Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Solis v. Panthera Painting, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc00407
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Panthera Painting, Inc., Andrew Manganas, Justin Hauth and others
Solis v Council for Educational Travel, USA
as 1:2012mc00022
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Council for Educational Travel, USA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Solis v. Koperna
as 3:2011cv00775
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Darryl Koperna
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Darryl Koperna
Counterclaim_defendant:
Hilda L. Solis
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0801
Solis v. Thomas
as 1:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Stephen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Solis v. Shingara
as 4:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Robert Shingara
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0801
Solis v. Derrickson et al
as 1:2010mc00255
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Robert Derrickson, RRD Land Clearing Inc. and RRD Clearing Inc. Health Plan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Solis v. Slocum et al
as 3:2009cv02490
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Scott Slocum, Dalton Mechanical Services, Inc. and Dalton Mechanical Simple IRA Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
