Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Merritts v. Blair County Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Merritts
Defendant:
Blair County Prison, Prime Care Medical, Inc., Abbie Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lehr v. Chas G. Allen Inc.
as 1:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Angela L. Lehr and Angela L. Merritt
Defendant:
Chas G. Allen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Merritt-Scully et al
as 3:2021cv02167
Plaintiff:
Gary Walker
Defendant:
CHCA Merritt-Scully, Brian Davis, Department of Corrections Healthcare Contractors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hubert v. Luscavage et al
as 3:2021cv01523
Plaintiff:
James Hubert
Defendant:
Anthony Luscavage, Karen Merritt-Scully, Nicole Boguslaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv01436
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Brown
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman, Travis Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 1:2020cv02454
Defendant:
Karen Merritt-Scully, Sargeant Burns, Warden John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels vs. Kauffman, et al
as 3:2020cv00442
Defendant:
Officer Henry, Kevin Kauffmann, Officer Cherry and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zamichieli v. Merritts et al
as 3:2020cv00180
Plaintiff:
Lamont Zamichieli
Defendant:
C.O. Parkes, Huntingdon County, Jane Doe(1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanza v. Moclock et al
as 3:2019cv02137
Defendant:
Trisha Kelley, Superintendent McGinley, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Enrico Lanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01941
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, SCI Coal John Doe, (2), Trisha Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
