Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rainey v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
George Rainey
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Coal Township and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rainey v. Ransom et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rainey
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, Jason Bohinski, Richardo Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kehoe v. PA DOC Director of Food Services at Central Office et al
as 3:2021cv00929
Defendant:
Rev. Rainey, Rev. Klemm, Mr. Stuller and others
Plaintiff:
John Kehoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rainey v. Link et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Mr. Richard Ellers, Cynthia Link, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey v. Spaulding et al
as 4:2016cv02288
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Rainey
Respondent:
Spaulding and Jane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rainey v. Oddo et al
as 4:2015cv01817
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Rainey
Respondent:
Oddo, USP Allenwood and Jane and/or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rainey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01093
Plaintiff:
Carrie D. Rainey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rainey v. Supt. SCI Coal Township et al
as 1:2015cv00839
Petitioner:
George Rainey
Respondent:
Supt. SCI Coal Township, District Attorney of York County PA and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rainey v. Superintendent S.C.I. Coal Township et al
as 4:2013cv01806
Petitioner:
Eugene Howard Rainey
Respondent:
Superintendent S.C.I. Coal Township and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
