Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Fann, Jr. v. Salamon et al
as 4:2023cv01787
Plaintiff:
Gregory O. Fann, Jr.
Defendant:
Bobby-Jo Salamon, Gregory Little, D.R. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres-Santiago v. J.C. Blair Clinic et al
as 1:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Torres-Santiago
Defendant:
J.C. Blair Clinic, Kevin Kauffman, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Acme Markets, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Torres
Defendant:
Acme Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Torres v. Briggs et al
as 1:2023cv00976
Petitioner:
Jesus Manuel Torres
Respondent:
Gregory Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimmel v. Doughty et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Davey James Kimmel
Defendant:
C.O. Doughty, C.O. Torres, C.O. McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01701
Petitioner:
Juan R. Torres
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
