General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 112
SUTTON v. MOSER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00210
Petitioner: GENE C. SUTTON
Respondent: V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TALLEY v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01006
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY C/JT. and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Petitioner: ANTRON TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCGEE v. CAPOZZA
as 2:2018cv00502
Petitioner: VINCENT C. MCGEE
Respondent: MARK CAPOZZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAY v. THOMPSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01677
Petitioner: LAWRENCE C. GRAY
Respondent: BRIAN H. THOMPSON, LEO DUNN, STEVEN A. ZAPPALA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. COZZA et al
as 2:2017cv01658
Petitioner: JAMES C. YOUNG
Respondent: MARK COZZA, JOSH SHAPIRO, JOHN PECK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHARLES v. BRADLEY
as 3:2017cv00200
Petitioner: CARLOS C. CHARLES
Defendant: ERIC BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01817
Petitioner: TIMOTHY C. SMITH
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and BRUCE BEEMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MONROE v. MILLION
as 3:2016cv00244
Petitioner: MICHAEL C. MONROE
Respondent: SEAN MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BORING v. SUPERINTENDANT GARMAN
as 3:2016cv00163
Petitioner: ROBERT C. BORING
Respondent: SUPERINTENDANT GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
TIPPETT v. MILLION
as 3:2016cv00119
Petitioner: HENRY C. TIPPETT, JR.
Respondent: SHAWN MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?