Cases 41 - 50 of 86
KEEL v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2011cv00318
Petitioner:
ANDREW AIMEE KEEL
Respondent:
COLEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01256
Petitioner:
CHARLES BROWN
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STRATTON v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01190
Petitioner:
ROBERT STRATTON
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REESE v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01155
Petitioner:
LOUIS REESE
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELDRIDGE v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv01007
Petitioner:
TYRONE ELDRIDGE
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DOBSON v. BRIAN COLEMAN, SUPERINTENDENT SCI FAYETTE GAOL et al
as 2:2011cv00924
Petitioner:
CORDELL DOBSON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KIDD v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00872
Petitioner:
GEORGE KIDD
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATIN & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00837
Petitioner:
REGINALD K. COLEMAN
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
APONTE v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00817
Petitioner:
JAVIER APONTE
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BORCHERT v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00741
Petitioner:
JAMES RAYMOND BORCHERT
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUTLER COUNTY and WILLIAM H. RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
