Cases 1 - 10 of 24
DAVIS v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2017cv00861
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and S.C.I. MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPUCK v. CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Petitioner:
DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent:
CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HURLEY v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2016cv01891
Petitioner:
DANIEL RICHARD HURLEY
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUCK v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv01578
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL LAMONT DUCK, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BRIAN THOMPSON, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPUCK v. THOMPSON
as 3:2016cv00172
Petitioner:
DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2015cv00129
Petitioner:
DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2015cv00112
Petitioner:
DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and PAUL STOWITSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODEN v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00173
Petitioner:
BEN GOODEN
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
SPUCK v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2014cv00219
Petitioner:
DANIEL LUKE SPUCK
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILNER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv01282
Petitioner:
WINFRED A. MILNER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BRIAN THOMPSON, STEPHEN ZAPPALA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
