Cases 1 - 10 of 88
BURLEY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00300
Petitioner:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, JOSHUA D. LAMANCUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELLIOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00262
Petitioner:
GEORGE G. ELLIOTT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEUTSCH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00915
Petitioner:
JAMES DEUTSCH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MORRIS HOUSER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GAMBREL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00888
Petitioner:
WILEY ESTILL GAMBREL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00110
Respondent:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, JOHN E. WETZEL, ERIC TICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNAN MCINTOSH and KEENAN MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDIVNER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00433
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and RICHARD BOWER
Petitioner:
JAMES W. VANDIVNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POLZER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00057
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SEAN A. KIRKPATRICK and JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
ROBERT D. POLZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KOLLOCK v. BEEMER et al
as 3:2018cv00208
Respondent:
JOHN E. TUTTLE, ALAN ROBINSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
JASON P. KOLLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMALLEY v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00407
Petitioner:
JACK SMALLEY
Respondent:
JEFF SESSIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL and PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAMBERT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv01686
Petitioner:
DAVID R LAMBERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
