Cases 21 - 30 of 1,386
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAPOLSKI v. GODEK et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. ZAPOLSKI
Defendant:
TROOPER RONALD GODEK, TROOPER KENT LOUCKS, GREGORY REICHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTON v. STAMPER et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
OMARI PATTON
Defendant:
KEITH STAMPER, CRAIG HALLER and JENNIFER HODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWAY v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONWAY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, CO- MOWREY, CO MOWREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. R. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JAMIR MITCHELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, LIEUTENANT BELL, SERGEANT KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GREGORY v. DAWDY et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GREGORY
Defendant:
PHM. TERRANCE DAWDY, OFFICER LUCAS S. DEHART, DUSTIN M. LANDFRIED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MONROE v. WAWERU
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
GRANT HARLEY MONROE
Defendant:
FRANCIS WAWERU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. PICHAI, ET AL
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
SUNDAR PICHAI and ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HELENKAMP v. JONES et al
as 2:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
MALACHI HELENKAMP
Defendant:
M. JONES, J. MCCLELLAND, MS. NOVAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
