Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
CARL CLARK
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MITCHELL v. JONES et al
as 1:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant:
EARL JONES, JOHN DOE #1, CAMBPELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. CLARKE
as 1:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B.B. CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCOTT v. PA DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00032
Defendant:
MR. CLARK and PA DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MACK v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEPUTY ADAMS, JOHN DOE, SUPERINTENDANT CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN MACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CLARK v. BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 3:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
WILLIS T. CLARK
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, RANDY FEATHERS and PETER J. WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BEASON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00090
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BEASON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLARK and DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CAPOZZO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BEASON v. SCI ALBION et al
as 1:2020cv00089
Defendant:
SCI PITTSBURGH, SCI ALBION, SUPERINTENDENT CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMEEL BEASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
