Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Proctor, Jr. v. Dialesandro et al
as 2:2023cv02104
Plaintiff:
James Hildred Proctor, Jr.
Defendant:
MARK DIALESANDRO, John Stabiel, Jr., SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PROCTOR v. DIALESANDRO et al
as 2:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor
Defendant:
MARK DIALESANDRO, John Stabiel, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01853
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LLOYD
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and GRIEVANCE COORDINATO MELINDA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WELTY v. DONKEWICZ et al
as 2:2021cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant:
GEORGE DONKEWICZ, SCI GREENE D.O.C., JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BURTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00141
Plaintiff:
NIARA BURTON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JAME BARNICLES, DAVID RADZIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TAYLOR v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
CONELIUS TAYLOR and CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and BARRY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BATES v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LUCINDA GAILEY and BARRY SMITH
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR GINTER and others
Petitioner:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WHITE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01546
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MELINDA ADAMS and MARCIA COMBINE
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GEORGE WHITE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GIBSON v. SUPER. M. ADAMS, et al.
as 2:2020cv01419
Defendant:
PA DOC, MERCER SCI STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY SUPER ADAMS, SUPER. M. ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
