Cases 1 - 10 of 24
VOORHIS et al v. DIGANGI
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VOORHIS and A.A.V. A MINOR
Defendant:
CINDY DIGANGI, JULIE LAFFERTY, OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AULENBACHER v. DOE 1-10
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. AULENBACHER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-10, CO JOHN DOE 1-10, CERT TEAM JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BYBEE v. FIFTH THIRD BANK et al
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BYBEE
Defendant:
FIFTH THIRD BANK, CHEX SYSTEMS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MEDINA v. JONES et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARIO MEDINA
Defendant:
OFFICER JONES, SERGEANT WINGER, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. JONES et al
as 1:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant:
EARL JONES, JOHN DOE #1, CAMBPELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. COPELIC et al
as 3:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES and ROBERT MILLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, C/O BENDICK, C/O MCGOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROSARIO v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PA et al
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMISSIONER, DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. CAPOZZA, et al
as 2:2021cv00133
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
RONELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
