Cases 1 - 10 of 128
HUNTER v. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
FAYDRA HUNTER
Defendant:
COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. doing business as CHARTWELLS DINING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
DOUBT v. CAVENDISH et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DOUBT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CAVENDISH and JAKE S. LIFSON, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
BAILY v. ALBATROSS VENTURES, LLC
as 2:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BAILY
Defendant:
ALBATROSS VENTURES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
WAKEFIELD v. ARC HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
ALICIA WAKEFIELD
Defendant:
ARC HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
VALENTINO v. UPMC HEALTH PLAN, INC.
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
DAWN M. VALENTINO
Defendant:
UPMC HEALTH PLAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
GUERCIO v. PREFERRED PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
CASSIDY GUERCIO
Defendant:
PREFERRED PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS, INC., CHARITY DEAN and ANDREA DIMOFF
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
FERREE v. CHEMIMAGE CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv01565
Plaintiff:
MELIA FERREE
Defendant:
CHEMIMAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
BECKNER v. UPMC SOMERSET
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
JULIA BECKNER
Defendant:
UPMC SOMERSET
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
STOUFFER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
MARK STOUFFER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
CATTERALL v. PUREPENN LLC
as 2:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
JAMES CATTERALL
Defendant:
TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORPORATION and PUREPENN LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
