Cases 41 - 50 of 5,386
MCCOMBS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Thomas McCombs, Jr.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk Souther Railway Systems and Norfolk Southern Railway Systems Lines
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC, RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND v. DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND
Defendant:
DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC., EDWARD W STACK, NAVDEEP GUPTA and others
CLIFFORD FISCHER & COMPANY v. STARR
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD FISCHER & COMPANY
Defendant:
CURT STARR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MARAPOSA SURGICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY et al v. THISTLE et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY and RICE DRILLING B LLC
Respondent:
HAROLD W THISTLE, JR and GAY E THISTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
