Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
XCOAL ENERGY & RESOURCES et al v. ASANOME
as 2:2022cv00968
Plaintiff:
XCOAL ENERGY & RESOURCES and XCOAL ENERGY & RESOURCES-JAPAN GK
Defendant:
MITSURU ASANOME
FREDRICKS v. CONSOL COAL RESOURCES, L.P. et al
as 2:2021cv01504
Plaintiff:
JOHN FREDRICKS
Defendant:
CONSOL COAL RESOURCES, L.P., JAMES A. BROCK, MARTHA A. WIEGAND and others
JACOBOWITZ v. RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00301
Defendant:
MARK S. SCUCCHI, ROGER S. MANNY, JEFFREY L. VENTURA and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JACOBOWITZ
RAUTERKUS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant:
DENISE COLEMAN, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MARIA RAUTERKUS and DAVID V. RAUTERKUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MARKWEST LIBERTY MIDSTREAM & RESOURCES, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2018cv00520
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
MARKWEST LIBERTY MIDSTREAM & RESOURCES, L.L.C. and OHIO GATHERING COMPANY, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
