Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LUDWIG v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
ROGER LUDWIG
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HUNTER FREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FURLONG v. SHIMSHOCK et al
as 2:2020cv01401
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, ROY A. DOWDELL, MASONTOWN BOROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. FURLONG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINCZNER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2017cv01553
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA WINCZNER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IGWE v. SKAGGS et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY IGWE
Defendant:
JEREMY SKAGGS , MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE , GLOBAL TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULAWKA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
MARZENA MULAWKA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MERCER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCINTYRE et al v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv00481
Plaintiff:
MARY KATHLEEN MCINTYRE and JOHN FERGUSON
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
PRUCHNIK v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 3:2007cv00231
Plaintiff:
EUGENE P. PRUCHNIK
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BOROUGH OF WINDBER, EUREKA COAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
ARTHUR v. RICHLAND TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
DAVID DUANE ARTHUR
Defendant:
RICHLAND TOWNSHIP, THOMAS E. KEIRN, THOMAS C. RUCKSER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
