Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TRAINER et al v. WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
RICHARD TRAINER, GLEN BEATTY and WAYNE TODD
Defendant:
WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
APPLEGATE v. BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.
as 2:2021cv00791
Defendant:
BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.
Plaintiff:
WAYNE APPLEGATE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
BRANDEBURA et al v. CRAIG DISTRIBUTING COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv01724
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KELLEY, WAYNE P. BROOKS, TAJAH RUSSELL and others
Defendant:
DEAN ROGERS and CRAIG DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CECERE et al v. SEMPERIT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
as 2:2019cv00504
Plaintiff:
LINDA CECERE and WAYNE CECERE
Defendant:
SEMPERIT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROSSI v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
WAYNE ROSSI
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DEPPENBROOK et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
PAUL DEPPENBROOK, ED ANTHONSEN, JOHN E. ATKINSON and others
Defendant:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
ARGUETA et al v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ARGUETA, RUSS CLAWSON, CHRISTOPHER BERMUDEZ and others
Defendant:
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MASTERS v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC
as 2:2008cv00337
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MASTERS
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
KOHAN v. LOWE'S HOME CENTER'S, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv00002
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTER'S, INC., LOWE'S HOME CENTER'S, INC., ERIC NEATROUR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
