Cases 11 - 20 of 22
DOMPATCI MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS v. VENSURE HR INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
DOMPATCI MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABDERRAHMANE DAHY v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01633
Plaintiff:
SIDI MOHAMED ABDERRAHMANE DAHY
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PADOVANO v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
as 2:2015cv01193
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PADOVANO
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JUAREZ v. FRIESS et al
as 1:2013cv00145
Defendant:
BRYAN FRIESS and FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO JUAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SPEDIRE TECHNOLOGY LLC v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01598
Plaintiff:
SPEDIRE TECHNOLOGY LLC
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. and FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HENRY et al v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
HESKETH P. HENRY and ROBERTA L. HENRY
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and JON BERGENSTOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
