Cases 21 - 30 of 139
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00780
Defendant:
IZZAT-AL DOUN-BAUTH PARTY OF IRAQ, ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH DIOCEASE OF PITTSBURGH, CHRIS ISLAM OF NIGERIA and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, Sr., ERNEST POOH THORTON and JAMES M. WHITEY BULGER MAFIA MALARIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KAETZ v. UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 2:2021cv00062
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS, MATTHEW A. HOHMAN, CLAIR CECCHI and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
AMERICAN PLATINUM PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. HP, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY, AMAZON.COM, INC. and HP, INC.
Plaintiff:
DOLLY MARSHALL and AMERICAN PLATINUM PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRESPO v. MASORTI & SULLIVAN, P.C. et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
LANCE MARSHALL, PHILIP M. MASORTI and MASORTI & SULLIVAN, P.C.
Plaintiff:
BARRY LEE CRESPO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. JUSTICES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT et al
as 2:2020cv00590
Respondent:
TODD, BAER, DOUGHERTY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS V TURKEY ET AL
as 2:2020cv00453
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, SYRIA, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2020cv00441
Respondent:
RICH FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
ALVIN M. HAILEY
Defendant:
COUNSELOR MARSHALL, JOHN WETZEL, OFFICER HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WATSON v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv00382
Petitioner:
KEVIN WATSON
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALLS and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
